Goskoopkhozes for the uplift of agriculture: a note by A. Grechukha on the reorganization of the kolkhoz - MTS system. December 1957

Document publication

doi 10.28995/2073-0101-2024-4-1177-1195

For citation

Andreenkov, Sergey N. (2024), Goskoopkhozes for the uplift of agriculture: A. Grechukha's note on the reorganization of the kolkhoz - MTS system, December 1957, Herald of an Archivist, № 4, pp. 1177-1195, doi 10.28995/2073-0101-2024-4-1177-1195

Andreenkov, Sergey N., Institute of History, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

Goskoopkhozes for the uplift of agriculture: a note by A. Grechukha on the reorganization of the kolkhoz - MTS system. December 1957

Abstract

The Khrushchev Thaw was a period of significant and ambiguous changes in the life of the Soviet state and society. Very contradictory trends were observed in the development of the country's agrarian system. Agrarian reforms of 1953-1964 led to its tangible liberalization, and at the same time the supreme power continued to use administrative methods of solving economic problems. One of the most important directions of agrarian reform in the thaw period was the reorganization of machine and tractor stations (MTS) - the most important component of the collective farm system and the basis of its logistical support system. In the economic conditions of the mid-1950s, the Kolkhoz-MTS system, which had been established back in the Stalinist period, needed to be reformed. And it was carried out in favor of collective farms. MTS were liquidated, and their property was transferred on a reimbursable basis into the ownership of agricultural enterprises. But the new owner of machinery used this production resource not in the best way. In the national historiography there are two opinions about the goals, course and results of the reorganization of the MTS in 1958. Some researchers consider it to be an expedient but unsuccessful measure, while others believe that the MTS should not have been liquidated, since collective farms could not effectively dispose of complex machinery. It is now known that the supreme power considered an alternative option of reforming the Kolkhoz-MTS system, which consisted in combining these two organizational and economic forms to form a new type of agricultural enterprises. Two projects of combining MTS and collective farms have been identified. The author of the first one was K. D. Karpov, the head of the Planning and Finance Department of the Main Directorate of MTS in the Urals. The main sections of his note to the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee (December 1955) on the formation of socialist farms (sotskhozes) have already been published. The published article introduces into scientific circulation the basic provisions of the second note (December 1957), - the project for the creation of state-cooperative enterprises (goskoopkhozes). The author of the document was A. Grechukha, director of the Potok MTS in the Poltava region of the Ukrainian SSR. The published document recognized the futility of further preservation of two owners on one land and at the same time substantiated the inexpediency of selling MTS equipment to collective farms. The mass transformation of agricultural associations into state farms was also questioned. According to the author of the recommendations, state farms allowed to reduce the management apparatus, create incentives for farm workers to work, provide conditions for better use of machinery, correctly calculate the cost of production and profitability of production and, in general, quickly raise agriculture. Association of MTS and collective farms can be considered a worthy alternative to the liquidation of stations.

Keywords

State farms, socialist farms, machine-tractor stations (MTS), collective farms, reorganization of MTS, agrarian transformations, agriculture, N. S. Khrushchev, historical sources.

Download the article: andreenkov_doi

References

Vyltsan, M. A. (1976), Restoration and development of the material and technical base of the collective farm system (1945-1958), Mysl, Moscow, USSR, 263 p.

Denisov, Y. P. (1996), Agrarian policy of N. S. Khrushchev: results and lessons, Social Sciences and Modernity, № 1, pp. 115-122.

Zelenin, I. E. (2001), Agrarian policy of N. S. Khrushchev and agriculture. IRI RAS, Moscow, Russia, 305 p.

Zubkova, E. Yu. (1995), Malenkov and Khrushchev: personal factor in the policy of the post-Stalin leadership, Otechestvennaya istoriya, № 4, pp. 103-115.

Konyshev, D. N. (2011), State policy of limitation of personal subsidiary farming (late 1950s - early 1960s), Russian History, № 3, pp. 102-111.

Pakhomova, E. V. (2019), Development of the “second virgin land”: an attempt to implement the “superprogram” in the Orenburg region, Samara Scientific Bulletin, vol. 8, № 3 (28), pp. 239-243.

Stalin, I. V. (2011), Economic problems of socialism in the USSR. State Publishing House of Political Literature. 1952. Conceptual, Moscow, Russia, 156 p.

Tomilin, V. N. (2021), State and kolkhozes: 1946-1964 gg. AIRO-XXI, Moscow, Russia, 448 p.

Tomilin, V. N. (2009), Our fortress. Machine and Tractor Stations of the Black Earth Center of Russia in the Postwar Period: 1946-1958 gg. AIRO-XXI,. Moscow, Russia, 400 p.

Zhuang, Shiqi. (2021), Agrarian Policy and Development of Agriculture in the USSR in 1953-1959, Russian History, № 3, pp. 144-154.

McCauley, M. (1995), The Khrushchev Era: 1953–1964, Longman, London, 141 p.

Zhuang, Shiqi. (2021), Agrarian Policy and Development of Agriculture in the USSR in 1953-1959, Russian History, № 3, pp. 144-154.

McCauley, M. (1995), The Khrushchev Era: 1953–1964. Longman, London, 141 p.

Tauger, M. B. (2006), Modernisation in Soviet Agriculture. IN: Modernisation in Russia since 1900. Studio Fennica Historica, vol. 12, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki, pp. 84–103.

Wegren, S. K. (1998), Agriculture and the state in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 294 p.

About the authors

Andreenkov Sergey N., PhD, Senior Researcher, Agrarian and Demographic History Sector, Institute of History, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia, 8-953-874-78-58, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Grant information

The article was carried out under the state assignment “Socio-economic potential of Russia's eastern regions in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. management strategies and practices, dynamics, geopolitical context” (FWZM-2024-0005).

The article was received in the editorial office on 26.02.2024, recommended for publication on 20.09.2024.